Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

High Maitenance


To the white guy who posted a
Newspaper clipping of
Vietnamese mail order brides,
Saying
This is for all the homeboys
With yellow fever who don't want
High maintenance
Americanized
Viet girls...
 To the white guy who
Astutely commented
With an emphasis on the
ASS in ass-tutely,
‎Although it still goes on today,
Pretty much almost everywhere else in the world
Where they haven’t adopted a
Western-type culture for their society.
To this white guy
This dipshit, I say:

You must have missed the memo
That "western culture" has been
Dominating, subjugating, and
Destroying societies since antiquity.
Cue fact,
That antiquity already automatically indexes
Greco-Roman-Western ancient society.
As if nothing else mattered.

You probably missed the other memo too,
About the horrific human trafficking
That goes on within the US
Apparently the epitome of western society
Just isn't western enough...

High maintenance
Americanized Viet girls?
What's really HIGH MAINTAINENANCE
Is dealing with dipshits like you
Who forget that
WE ARE HERE
CUASE YOU FUCKED IT UP
OVER THERE
And go on to spew garbage that is
Misogynistic as hell and
Perpetuates the continual oppression of
Communities not only in this country,
But also across the world.

For all the guys who said "YEAH"
Why don't you ask yourself
If you would still say that if it were
Your mother, your sister, your child who is
Trapped in that scenario?
What would you say to the other guys
Who would still be saying "YEAH"?
OR DOES ONE ALWAYS
HAVE TO GO SO FAR INTO
HYPOTHETICALS
WITHOUT REALIZING THE
SERIOUSNESS OF THE ISSUE,
WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO RECOGNIZE
THAT COMMUNITY IS IN FACT
AN EXTENSION OF YOURSELF?
THAT WHAT HAPPENS TO "OTHERS"
ALSO MATTERS TO YOURSELF?!

So before you start calling
Women who refuse to part of your
Fucked up orientalist exotifications
"High maintenance"
 Why don't you contemplate about how
High maintenance your
Ignorance is to others who have to
Deal with the pain of reading your
Stupid words and process it by typing up
A damned long response to it on Facebook.
Shit.

Monday, July 25, 2011

Justice Gone Haywire: The Raquel Nelson Case

A day ago I received an email from change.org regarding a petition to tell a Georgia judge to not jail a mother who was grieving her son who had been killed in a hit and run accident. I was surprised that this could actually happen, so I went on google to find out anything I could about the mother and what had happened to her famiy. 
The story starts off on the night of April 16. 2010 when Raquel Nelson and her three children had gotten off at the bus stop across from their home in Marietta, Georgia. As several others who had gotten off at the same stop began crossing the dark street, AJ, Raquel's son, took off with the crowd perhaps thinking that it was their turn to cross the street. Immediately Raquel ran after her son and in that moment tragedy struck in the form of a tan SUV that sped off after hitting Raquel, her daughter, and AJ. While Raquel and her daughter suffered minor injuries, AJ was not so fortunate and died a few hours after being admitted to the hospital.
Police eventually arrested the driver, Jerry Guy, who admitted to a "few beers", painkillers, and a being partly blind in one eye. So now not only was it hit and run, but also a case of negligent driving (though the ads say buzzed driving equals =  drunk driving, it looks like the law books haven't caught up yet). Originally Guy was charged with first degree vehicular homicide, cruelty to children, and hit and run, but in the end he was only found guilty of hit and run. Though this had been his third time being convicted with a hit and run, Guy served only 6 months of jail and was allowed to spend the remaining 5 years of his sentence on probation.
Ironically the charges that Guy were not convicted with were used by the Georgia Solicitor General's office in convicting Raquel. She was charged with reckless conduct, improperly crossing a roadway and second-degree homicide by vehicle. Each of these crimes is a misdemeanor that carries a maximum punishment of 12 months in prison, so in total Nelson  faces a maximum of 36 months, or three years, in prison during her sentence hearing tomorrow.
The circumstances of this case seem utterly bizarre to me in many different aspects.
  1. Why was Guy given such a light sentence and then allowed to serve probation, this being his third time being the perpetrator in a hit and run?
  2. Coincidentally Nelson was charged with her crimes after the Atlanta Journal Constitution ran a high profile article regarding jaywalkers noting that Nelson had not been charged with anything. Georgia DA saving face?
  3. She's being charged with second degree vehicular homicide- so aside from the fact that she was not in a vehicle, and interpreting the crime as a crime of negligence, the charge still doesn't make sense. Indeed, she had not crossed at a cross walk (whose location about 3/10 of mile away has been source of previous complaints before this incident) but she did run after her son and was also hit in the process. I see no negligence in her effort to save her son.
  4. Reckless conduct? Really? Really? Not to mention that even the hit and run driver had not been charged with reckless conduct, it should be the Georgia department of motor vehicles that should be charged with reckless conduct in allowing a person with such a bad driving record on the streets.
  5. She was an African American single parent convicted by a jury of all middle class whites (jury of peers, anyone?) who did not use public transportation. While Nelson, herself has been very cautious about "pulling the race card" in regards to her trial- I think that the biases of jury, most likely their assumptions towards African American single mothers were clearly reflected in their speedy conviction of all three counts.
  6. Probably the point of most contention is the fact that Nelson did not use a cross walk. First of all, I don't think the power of crosswalk would have prevented Guy from committing a hit and run while under the influence. Second of all, Nelson was just trying get her family home since it was dark and late outside- the dark cross walk 3/10 of mile away seemed just as bad if not worse, then just crossing the street in front of them. Third, SEVERAL people successfully crossed the street before the Nelsons did- and it was only the unfortunate chance that Guy happened to be drunk driving along the street that caused the tragedy.
  7. Why is there so much focus on the mom? In all of the threads and comments regarding the story it seems like everybody is focusing on Raquel and how she failed to use the cross walk. Why isn't their outrage at how Guy is able to serve the rest of his sentence on probation? Why was he even allowed to drive in the first place with such a horrific record? Why do we put so much blame on the mother who has lost her son, and not on the actual man who killed him? Sexism, anyone?
  8. How is putting a Raquel Nelson in jail for three years when she still has two young daughters to raise going to benefit society in any way? As an example to warn to people not to jaywalk if you're a single parent African American woman? Or that it will serve as legal precedent on how you can get away relatively unscathed if you kill a child in a hit and run after popping some pain pills and washing it down with beer? Or to show that justice is blind- completely blind to even common sense.
  9. A commentator once said about the conviction of Nelson that "fairness has taken a backseat to justice"- to continue this car analogy I think fairness has not only taken the backseat, but has also been thrown out the window (letting Guy get out on parole), trampled once by justice reversing the car (charging Nelson with crimes), and run over once again by justice driving that car straight to sentencing.
One way to help out Raquel and the Nelson family is by signing the petition below that asks the judge to not sentence Raquel to jail. It also is requesting a new cross to be installed to prevent future tragedies from occurring. http://www.change.org/petitions/cobb-county-ga-release-grieving-mother-of-hit-and-run-install-a-crosswalk

For more on the story regarding the Nelson case go here and here.

I'll be waiting for the verdict tomorrow- hopefully it will be that Nelson can go back home to her little girls and move on with the loss of her son.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Follow Up: Buddhist Nun Arrested for Handing Out Prayer Beads

When I saw this story for the first time back in June, I was so shocked and angry at the unjust treatment of Buddhist nun Venerable Hong Yuan (she is referred by most news media by her non- Buddhist name, Baojing Li) at the hands of the NYPD. On June 2, 2011 the NYPD arrested in Chinatown on the busy street corner of Canal and Motts for handing out prayer beads to supporters who donated to her fund to rebuild her burned down temple back in Georgia (they claimed she was "hawking costume jewelry"-the NYPD at its finest). Though Venerable Hong Yuan could not speak English, many bystanders explained to the police the true nature of what she was doing, but all of the witnesses' pleas fell on deaf ears. Hong Yuan was subsequently detained for at least four hours without having anyone in the department explain to her what she had done wrong. For more on the original story go here.

FOLLOW UP: On July 8th, 2011 Venerable Hong Yuan refused to take a plea bargain that would require her to perform one day of community service and has asked the judge for the case to be dismissed. As of now the DA has not dropped the case yet. For the full update go here.

Baojing Li, 48, refused to plead guilty to disorderly conduct after she was arrested for selling prayer beads on Canal St. (DNAinfo/Shayna Jacobs)

This case can really be defined by how her lawyer Robert Brown bluntly states it: "If this was a Catholic nun in a habit giving out rosary beads, I can't imagine a police officer in the City of New York arresting her."
So kudos to the Venerable Hong Yuan for standing up for herself, because its not she who needs to do community service but obviously the NYPD that needs to be educated about diversity in the community! Hopefully the DA wills top wasting tax payer money to prosecute an innocent person on the count of the NYPD's mistakes.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Something is Rotten in the City of Alhambra...

This story originating in the city of Alhambra, California, back in 2007 had all the components of a modern day mystery thriller: a fiery blaze, a mysterious death, an eerie videotape, a government cover up, and a protagonist who had uncovered the truth only to be hounded by his own department. Though we rarely find so much drama outside of the movie theater, this was the exact situation that Ken Toh, a veteran fire protection specialist with the Alhambra Fire Department found himself entrapped in.
In the aftermath of the massive blaze of a Chinese strip mall that occurred on July 16th, 2007, the Alhambra Fire Department dispatched Toh to investigate the cause of the fire since he was the only individual in the department who could speak Cantonese and Mandarin. It is truly surprising to note that given Alhambra's 52.9% Asian demographic there was only ONE individual in the whole department capable of communicating with such a large portion of the community-but this is just the beginning of all the strangeness that follows.
Without performing a thorough investigation of the incident to determine the actual cause of the blaze, Fire Chief John Kabala hastily proclaimed to the media that the fire had been caused by an electrical fault in the Happy Bakery located on the eastern portion of the mall. What Kabala obviously failed to see was what Toh discovered to be the dead body of Charlie Lee, the owner of a frame store located all the way on the opposite end of the same strip mall. But it seemed Kabala had made up his mind, and so an electrical fire was an electrical fire despite the evidence that Toh had further amassed in security camera footage and witness testimony that pointed to an entirely different conclusion.
"Ken Toh and Mike Hatzbanian found security tapes of the dead man entering the building. The Alhambra Fire Department said it wasn't interested"- from LA Weekly

So what happens next? The Alhambra Fire Department instead of investigating the death of Lee, began a full-blown investigation of Toh, using surveillance techniques such as having a friend wear a wire to record Toh without his knowledge (Despite how illegal this may seem, apparently under CA law, investigation officers are allowed to record individuals without his or her prior knowledge).The fire department ultimately fired Toh after it had placed him on paid absence (they subsequently interrogated other people in the department and also fired them for being unwilling to testify against Toh in court- if this whole deal doesn't seem absurd enough, it gets worse). Toh was later prosecuted by the DA who ironically implicated him in the cover up of the fire, accusing him of being in cahoots with the strip mall owner Peter Fong to help Fong avoid a civil lawsuit for having faulty wiring by claiming it was arson. In the end the jurors saw how tenuous the prosecution's argument was and Toh was not convicted. However, Toh is still unable to find employment due to how badly the department has tarnished his name despite his fight for justice in the community (the Monterey Park Fire Depart balked at hiring a private company because it was later told that Toh would be the one doing the work!)  The mysterious death of Charlie Lee has yet to be fully investigated either.